Question description

Peer Evaluation Use the grading rubric to guide your evaluation. Does the paper include all of the required
components? Is the argument clear? Are the course concepts defined and applied correctly?
Does the author complete what they set out to do in the introduction? Is it well written and
clearly organized? What suggestions might you offer for improvement? What does the author do
Be constructive with your feedback. Instead of saying that something is terrible, explain how it
could be fixed. For example, you could suggest that they provide more information on something
that is not clearly explained, or that they reorganize the paper according to some themes that
have emerged in the writing.
The most efficient strategy would probably be to use track changes or comments in Microsoft

~~~For this or similar assignment papers~~~